How long do red card appeals take? (Tiote)

ColoradoMagpie · 10th January 2011 05:32 PM

When do you think we'll hear something? I'll feel a lot better about mackems with him in the middle.

viana45 · 10th January 2011 05:39 PM

It takes as long as it takes

The Steve · 10th January 2011 05:56 PM

Couple of days. Quite a quick process so we'll know in plenty of time

10th January 2011 05:58 PM

it would be awesome if it was recsinded,..but the fa could take into conderation the fact he has already served a ban this season, which could fuck the appeal

ColoradoMagpie · 10th January 2011 06:16 PM

(10th January 2011 05:58 PM)Brassneck Wrote: Guests cannot see links in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see links.it would be awesome if it was recsinded,..but the fa could take into conderation the fact he has already served a ban this season, which could fuck the appeal

So much for the Common Law concept of being tried for the offense alleged and not prior acts! FA probably follows frog-influenced law.

NE1 · 10th January 2011 06:17 PM

They will look at this offence, nothing more.

It will probably be thursday morning.

10th January 2011 06:20 PM

(10th January 2011 06:16 PM)ColoradoMagpie Wrote: Guests cannot see links in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see links.
(10th January 2011 05:58 PM)Brassneck Wrote: Guests cannot see links in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see links.it would be awesome if it was recsinded,..but the fa could take into conderation the fact he has already served a ban this season, which could fuck the appeal

So much for the Common Law concept of being tried for the offense alleged and not prior acts! FA probably follows frog-influenced law.

oh ofcourse they will take his previous ban into consideration,..come on, you don`t review the appeal of a player who has been sent off,.. without cheiking if he has previous,..and unfortunately tiote has, very recently,.. which could fuck the appeal

**omenator** · 10th January 2011 08:36 PM

Personally, it pains me to say it, it's touch and go, from the replays i've seen he does leave the ground in the tackle and regardless of him winning the ball, can be deemed reckless as if he caught the lads standing leg, it could have been easily broken and as you've said he does have previous which will be taken into account

10th January 2011 08:43 PM

i know,..its a tragedy if he misses the derby like,..total fuckin depressing

NE1 · 10th January 2011 08:56 PM

I dont hold up much hope here like. This is the rule...

Quote:Any player who lunges at an opponent in challenging for the ball from the front, from the side or from behind using one or both legs, with excessive force and endangering the safety of an opponent is guilty of serious foul play

I think the bit to concentrate on is "excessive force" & "endangering the safety of an opponent"

10th January 2011 09:07 PM

what about "Any player who (accidentily) lunges at an opponent in challenging for the ball from the front, from the side or from behind using one or both legs, with excessive force and endangering the safety of an opponent , shud escape without a ban, and be available for the derby....!!"

after all, Tiote didn`t mean it, he`s not that type of player,....seriously

liam1708 · 10th January 2011 11:27 PM

(10th January 2011 08:56 PM)NE1 Wrote: Guests cannot see links in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see links.I dont hold up much hope here like. This is the rule...

Quote:Any player who lunges at an opponent in challenging for the ball from the front, from the side or from behind using one or both legs, with excessive force and endangering the safety of an opponent is guilty of serious foul play

I think the bit to concentrate on is "excessive force" & "endangering the safety of an opponent"

Unless you're called DeJong, in which case it's acceptable to snap a players leg in two

The Steve · 11th January 2011 12:51 AM

I was just about to say Loam.

If it gets turned down then fair enough, but the lack of consistency is what gets me.

liam1708 · 11th January 2011 10:51 AM

His appeal will be heard today.

Guests cannot see links in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see links.

onthetoon1 · 11th January 2011 12:23 PM

(11th January 2011 12:51 AM)The Steve Wrote: Guests cannot see links in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see links.I was just about to say Loam.

If it gets turned down then fair enough, but the lack of consistency is what gets me.

Ageed. There was a tackle in the Derby FA Cup match last night (I think on Savage) which everyone agreed was much worse than Tiote's but only got a yellow.

richyNUFC · 11th January 2011 01:03 PM

I think the fact that his studs were pointed away from the player should come into consideration aswell.

He didn't lunge AT the player.

Silent Bob · 11th January 2011 01:10 PM

He lunged at the ball, but from a safe distance. By the time he reached the ball, he had slowed down, and was sliding in one footed, with studs facing away.

richyNUFC · 11th January 2011 01:19 PM

Exactly. Should be rescinded. Be a massive boost to the rest of the team if the appeal is succesful, and also a blow to the mackems confidence.

The Steve · 11th January 2011 01:23 PM

(11th January 2011 10:51 AM)liam1708 Wrote: Guests cannot see links in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see links.His appeal will be heard today.

Guests cannot see links in the messages. Please register to forum by clicking here to see links.

Like Richy says, it'll be a massive boost if it gets rescinded. Despite all the talk on here - I can't see the FA over turning it.

Figs · 11th January 2011 03:17 PM

They havn't the ban stands

Threaded Mode \| Linear Mode How long do red card appeals take? (Tiote)
Author	Message

How long do red card appeals take? (Tiote)

How long do red card appeals take? (Tiote)

NUFC forum